"We will take America without firing a shot." & "We will destroy you from within." --Nikita Khrushchev Nov. 18, 1956
Why the censorship of communism's goal?
For every American old enough to remember NBC’s “nightly news” program, the Huntley-Brinkley Report (1/4 hour-long format at that time) will NEVER forget Khrushchev’s statements above, as reported by David Brinkley on November 18, 1956, so distressing were they at the time and for decades after. But if you search in Wikipedia and Wikiquotes for either of these cold-war-defining sentences that Khrushchev said, you will not succeed in finding either...they’ve been surgically censored from those sites. If you’ll search the internet further, you’ll also find false debunking and denials on forums that they were ever spoken.
Why do the inexperienced think they should or even CAN tyrannically control the survivors of that era with censorship and rabid false debunking that these two sentences were spoken by the leader of the communist world? This coverup is arguably so SINISTER that it rivals holocaust denial. It is so fierce and so widespread that it demands we watch our backs and our votes, given that the existence of communism in a republic is dependent on ‘who counts the votes’.
Not only must we prevent ES&S from deciding election races in the darkness of their software, we must demand that our sacred votes be kept out of their possession. The temptation to steal or discard ballots by unscrupulous ballot deliverers is a temptation as old as voting itself. We have a constitutional right to “secrecy of elector’s votes” (pg 45), and we will lose that right if we don’t use it. I’m willing to lead the way in this interpretation of vote secrecy.
Please join me in serving your county commissioners notice that you do NOT waive your elector right to secrecy of your vote. Watch me do exactly that (timestamp 1:14:28 if your device-browser won’t auto-cue this link)
Kenneth L. Anderson
“The security of ballot boxes must be guaranteed and votes should be counted in the presence of the candidates or their agents. There should be independent scrutiny of the voting and counting process and access to judicial review or other equivalent process so that electors have confidence in the security of the ballot and the counting of the votes.”1
OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Accessed 12/15/2023
CCPR General Comment No. 25: Article 25 (Participation in Public Affairs and the Right to Vote)
The Right to Participate in Public Affairs, Voting Rights and the Right of Equal Access to Public Service
Adopted at the Fifty-seventh Session of the Human Rights Committee, on 12 July 1996
CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7, General Comment No. 25. (General Comments)